OER·harvester

Competency catalogue

The 104 active T2.3 competencies: the vocabulary the harvester searches with, the descriptor the alignment reads, and what the alignment found. Compose a harvest →

What the alignment foundHow often each was searched

How many resources the alignment reads as contributing to each competency or developing it: decided at level 2 or 3, or not decided yet and more likely than not to reach 2. 54 competencies have none, 24 one or two. Every figure is a lower bound: on a sample graded on every competency, the map counts 33% of what was graded 2 or 3, and almost nothing of the 5 competencies underlined with dots.

How many times a harvest has searched for each competency, once for each source it asked. 101 competencies have never been searched. A search is not material found: the aligned view says what came of it.

none 1–2 3–9 10–29 30+
never 1–2 3–5 6–11 12+
DDigital 94212203420012149086012303134 GGreen 0000000102000010000100010 RResilience & Entrepreneurial 004000000000000010000120000 TDeep Tech 72643202372825212335201140010

D10 Digital · Skill · Intermediate

Human-AI Collaboration

Distribute tasks between humans and AI based on respective strengths

Alignment

0 resources likely to contribute to it or develop it

None found yet in what the alignment has read.

On a graded sample, 4 pairs were graded 2 or 3 for it, and the map counts 0.

Retrieval

0 resources harvested by searching its terms

Never searched yet.

Search vocabulary

Domain group
human AI collaborationhuman machine teaminghuman AI task delegationtask allocationaugment human capacitycomplementary human and AI strengthshybrid intelligencecollaborative intelligencehuman AI teamwork

Zenodo and arXiv take the whole group in one query. GitHub takes one phrase at a time and works left to right, stopping once the competency is satisfied — so on that lane this order decides which terms actually run.

The compiled queries
zenodo ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" OR "generative AI" OR "deep learning" OR "reinforcement learning" OR "large language model" OR "AI") AND ("human AI collaboration" OR "human machine teaming" OR "human AI task delegation" OR "task allocation" OR "augment human capacity" OR "complementary human and AI strengths" OR "hybrid intelligence" OR "collaborative intelligence" OR "human AI teamwork")
arxiv (all:"artificial intelligence" OR all:"machine learning" OR all:"generative AI" OR all:"deep learning" OR all:"reinforcement learning" OR all:"large language model") AND (all:"human AI collaboration" OR all:"human machine teaming" OR all:"human AI task delegation" OR all:"task allocation" OR all:"augment human capacity" OR all:"complementary human and AI strengths" OR all:"hybrid intelligence" OR all:"collaborative intelligence" OR all:"human AI teamwork")
github · term 1 AI "human AI collaboration" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 2 AI "human machine teaming" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 3 AI "human AI task delegation" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 4 AI "task allocation" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 5 AI "augment human capacity" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 6 AI "complementary human and AI strengths" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 7 AI "hybrid intelligence" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 8 AI "collaborative intelligence" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 9 AI "human AI teamwork" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false

Profile c41e607b1acce2b1

Alignment descriptor draft

Outcomes
  • Can divide a task between people and AI according to what each does well.
  • Can design a workflow in which AI augments rather than replaces human work.
  • Can recognise when collaboration with AI degrades the quality of the work.
Develops it

Material on human–AI teaming: strengths of each, task allocation, examples of workflows that combine them, with exercises in planning such a division.

Only mentions it

A statement that 'AI will assist humans' with no account of how the work is divided.

Alignment terms
human-ai teaminghuman-ai interactionaugmented intelligencedivision of labour

Read in a resource's text beside the domain group. They are never compiled into a search.

Neighbours

Descriptor 364b3651054c

How a vocabulary becomes a search

Every candidate must match both concept groups in its title, description or keywords before any content is downloaded. Precision warnings are recorded for audit; they never silently cancel positive evidence.

  1. Official name and description
  2. AI/ML terms and domain terms
  3. Zenodo, arXiv and GitHub syntax
  4. Metadata relevance gate
Mandatory AI/ML group
artificial intelligencemachine learninggenerative AIdeep learningreinforcement learninglarge language modelAI

GitHub's repository search takes one phrase at a time. Measured against the live endpoint, a parenthesised OR group returns nothing at all where each term alone returns thousands, and the 256-character limit rejects a long group outright — so that lane issues one query per term and stops as soon as the competency is satisfied.

coverage-vocabulary-1.3.0+sha256:08ad2cd19868 · catalogue sha256:04970bfc77255b1f

What a descriptor is

A descriptor is how the alignment reads a competency: what a learner who has it can do, what a resource has to do to develop it, what only mentions it, the phrases its subject is written in, its false friends, and how to tell it from the competencies that share its words. The definition above it stays the authority.

Every descriptor is a draft until a partner approves it; 0 of 104 are approved. Read the alignment rubric →

competency-descriptors-1.0.0+sha256:3cc741a61ced