OER·harvester

Competency catalogue

The 104 active T2.3 competencies: the vocabulary the harvester searches with, the descriptor the alignment reads, and what the alignment found. Compose a harvest →

What the alignment foundHow often each was searched

How many resources the alignment reads as contributing to each competency or developing it: decided at level 2 or 3, or not decided yet and more likely than not to reach 2. 54 competencies have none, 24 one or two. Every figure is a lower bound: on a sample graded on every competency, the map counts 33% of what was graded 2 or 3, and almost nothing of the 5 competencies underlined with dots.

How many times a harvest has searched for each competency, once for each source it asked. 101 competencies have never been searched. A search is not material found: the aligned view says what came of it.

none 1–2 3–9 10–29 30+
never 1–2 3–5 6–11 12+
DDigital 94212203420012149086012303134 GGreen 0000000102000010000100010 RResilience & Entrepreneurial 004000000000000010000120000 TDeep Tech 72643202372825212335201140010

R19 Resilience & Entrepreneurial · Skill · Intermediate

Stakeholder Engagement with AI

Communicate AI strategies to diverse stakeholders

Alignment

0 resources likely to contribute to it or develop it

None found yet in what the alignment has read.

On a graded sample, 1 pair was graded 2 or 3 for it, and the map counts 0.

Retrieval

0 resources harvested by searching its terms

Never searched yet.

Search vocabulary

Domain group
stakeholder engagementmobilising othersmobilizing othersstakeholder communicationstakeholder managementAI strategy communicationpublic engagementparticipatory governancestakeholder trust

Zenodo and arXiv take the whole group in one query. GitHub takes one phrase at a time and works left to right, stopping once the competency is satisfied — so on that lane this order decides which terms actually run.

The compiled queries
zenodo ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" OR "generative AI" OR "deep learning" OR "reinforcement learning" OR "large language model" OR "AI") AND ("stakeholder engagement" OR "mobilising others" OR "mobilizing others" OR "stakeholder communication" OR "stakeholder management" OR "AI strategy communication" OR "public engagement" OR "participatory governance" OR "stakeholder trust")
arxiv (all:"artificial intelligence" OR all:"machine learning" OR all:"generative AI" OR all:"deep learning" OR all:"reinforcement learning" OR all:"large language model") AND (all:"stakeholder engagement" OR all:"mobilising others" OR all:"mobilizing others" OR all:"stakeholder communication" OR all:"stakeholder management" OR all:"AI strategy communication" OR all:"public engagement" OR all:"participatory governance" OR all:"stakeholder trust")
github · term 1 AI "stakeholder engagement" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 2 AI "mobilising others" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 3 AI "mobilizing others" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 4 AI "stakeholder communication" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 5 AI "stakeholder management" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 6 AI "AI strategy communication" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 7 AI "public engagement" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 8 AI "participatory governance" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 9 AI "stakeholder trust" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false

Profile 42af012a0c94061c

Alignment descriptor draft

Outcomes
  • Can explain an AI strategy to stakeholders with different interests.
  • Can engage stakeholders in decisions about AI.
  • Can address concerns and build trust.
Develops it

Material on stakeholder engagement for AI — mapping, communication, participation — with plans or role plays.

Only mentions it

A list of stakeholders in a project template.

Alignment terms
stakeholder engagementstakeholder communicationstakeholder mappingpublic engagementtrust building

Read in a resource's text beside the domain group. They are never compiled into a search.

Neighbours

Descriptor 2e75385c04ae

How a vocabulary becomes a search

Every candidate must match both concept groups in its title, description or keywords before any content is downloaded. Precision warnings are recorded for audit; they never silently cancel positive evidence.

  1. Official name and description
  2. AI/ML terms and domain terms
  3. Zenodo, arXiv and GitHub syntax
  4. Metadata relevance gate
Mandatory AI/ML group
artificial intelligencemachine learninggenerative AIdeep learningreinforcement learninglarge language modelAI

GitHub's repository search takes one phrase at a time. Measured against the live endpoint, a parenthesised OR group returns nothing at all where each term alone returns thousands, and the 256-character limit rejects a long group outright — so that lane issues one query per term and stops as soon as the competency is satisfied.

coverage-vocabulary-1.3.0+sha256:08ad2cd19868 · catalogue sha256:04970bfc77255b1f

What a descriptor is

A descriptor is how the alignment reads a competency: what a learner who has it can do, what a resource has to do to develop it, what only mentions it, the phrases its subject is written in, its false friends, and how to tell it from the competencies that share its words. The definition above it stays the authority.

Every descriptor is a draft until a partner approves it; 0 of 104 are approved. Read the alignment rubric →

competency-descriptors-1.0.0+sha256:3cc741a61ced