OER·harvester

Competency catalogue

The 104 active T2.3 competencies: the vocabulary the harvester searches with, the descriptor the alignment reads, and what the alignment found. Compose a harvest →

What the alignment foundHow often each was searched

How many resources the alignment reads as contributing to each competency or developing it: decided at level 2 or 3, or not decided yet and more likely than not to reach 2. 54 competencies have none, 24 one or two. Every figure is a lower bound: on a sample graded on every competency, the map counts 33% of what was graded 2 or 3, and almost nothing of the 5 competencies underlined with dots.

How many times a harvest has searched for each competency, once for each source it asked. 101 competencies have never been searched. A search is not material found: the aligned view says what came of it.

none 1–2 3–9 10–29 30+
never 1–2 3–5 6–11 12+
DDigital 94212203420012149086012303134 GGreen 0000000102000010000100010 RResilience & Entrepreneurial 004000000000000010000120000 TDeep Tech 72643202372825212335201140010

R27 Resilience & Entrepreneurial · Skill · Advanced

Human Agency & Oversight Strategy

Design organisational arrangements that preserve meaningful human agency and oversight over AI-supported decisions, in line with EU AI Act Article 14

Alignment

0 resources likely to contribute to it or develop it

None found yet in what the alignment has read.

On a graded sample, 1 pair was graded 2 or 3 for it, and the map counts 0.

Retrieval

0 resources harvested by searching its terms

Never searched yet.

Search vocabulary

Domain group
human agencyhuman oversightmeaningful human controlAI governance arrangementsEU AI Act Article 14oversight strategyhuman interventioncontestable decisions

Zenodo and arXiv take the whole group in one query. GitHub takes one phrase at a time and works left to right, stopping once the competency is satisfied — so on that lane this order decides which terms actually run.

The compiled queries
zenodo ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" OR "generative AI" OR "deep learning" OR "reinforcement learning" OR "large language model" OR "AI") AND ("human agency" OR "human oversight" OR "meaningful human control" OR "AI governance arrangements" OR "EU AI Act Article 14" OR "oversight strategy" OR "human intervention" OR "contestable decisions")
arxiv (all:"artificial intelligence" OR all:"machine learning" OR all:"generative AI" OR all:"deep learning" OR all:"reinforcement learning" OR all:"large language model") AND (all:"human agency" OR all:"human oversight" OR all:"meaningful human control" OR all:"AI governance arrangements" OR all:"EU AI Act Article 14" OR all:"oversight strategy" OR all:"human intervention" OR all:"contestable decisions")
github · term 1 AI "human agency" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 2 AI "human oversight" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 3 AI "meaningful human control" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 4 AI "AI governance arrangements" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 5 AI "EU AI Act Article 14" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 6 AI "oversight strategy" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 7 AI "human intervention" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false
github · term 8 AI "contestable decisions" in:name,description,readme fork:false archived:false

Profile 49527d6aa7d18bb6

Alignment descriptor draft

Outcomes
  • Can design organisational arrangements for meaningful human oversight of AI.
  • Can define who can intervene, when and how, in AI-supported decisions.
  • Can relate the arrangements to the AI Act's requirements on oversight.
Develops it

Material on human agency and oversight strategy — roles, intervention points, contestability, Article 14 — with designs the learner produces.

Only mentions it

A sentence that humans remain in control.

Alignment terms
human oversighthuman agencymeaningful human controlarticle 14contestability

Read in a resource's text beside the domain group. They are never compiled into a search.

Neighbours

Descriptor c8e0be89481e

How a vocabulary becomes a search

Every candidate must match both concept groups in its title, description or keywords before any content is downloaded. Precision warnings are recorded for audit; they never silently cancel positive evidence.

  1. Official name and description
  2. AI/ML terms and domain terms
  3. Zenodo, arXiv and GitHub syntax
  4. Metadata relevance gate
Mandatory AI/ML group
artificial intelligencemachine learninggenerative AIdeep learningreinforcement learninglarge language modelAI

GitHub's repository search takes one phrase at a time. Measured against the live endpoint, a parenthesised OR group returns nothing at all where each term alone returns thousands, and the 256-character limit rejects a long group outright — so that lane issues one query per term and stops as soon as the competency is satisfied.

coverage-vocabulary-1.3.0+sha256:08ad2cd19868 · catalogue sha256:04970bfc77255b1f

What a descriptor is

A descriptor is how the alignment reads a competency: what a learner who has it can do, what a resource has to do to develop it, what only mentions it, the phrases its subject is written in, its false friends, and how to tell it from the competencies that share its words. The definition above it stays the authority.

Every descriptor is a draft until a partner approves it; 0 of 104 are approved. Read the alignment rubric →

competency-descriptors-1.0.0+sha256:3cc741a61ced