The Duality of Generative AI and Reinforcement Learning in Robotics: A Review
Recently, generative AI and reinforcement learning (RL) have been redefining what is possible for AI agents that take information flows as input and produce intelligent behavior. As a result, we are seeing similar advancements in embodied AI and robotics for control policy generation. Our review paper examines the integration of generative AI models with RL to advance robotics. Our primary focus is on the duality be…
Licence
OPEN
CC-BY-4.0
Authors
Angelo Moroncelli, Vishal Soni, Marco Forgione, Dario Piga, Blerina S…
Policy distillation is a well-known concept in the RL literature [131]. Recently, with the emergence of large generalist generative policies, RL-based methods for policy distillation have been applied to VLA models. In particular, recent works have explored policy distillation in OpenVLA [80] and Octo [118]. The goal of policy distillation is to transfer pre-trained knowledge from a teacher policy to a student policy. The recent literature can be categorized into two opposing approaches:
From Generalist to Expert: Jülg et al. [78] developed a method to create task-specific RL agents distilled from a pre-trained VLA model. While VLA models are known for their strong generalization capabilities, they often struggle to achieve highly precise results compared to task-specific RL policies. The key idea is that the internal knowledge of VLA models can be useful in guiding RL exploration for specific agents. However, this work primarily presents preliminary simulation results, emphasizing that sim-to-real transfer remains the main challenge when training RL policies in simulation. This is particularly relevant given that OpenVLA and Octo typically perform better in real-world conditions [119, 89].
From Experts to Generalist: Xu et al. [164] propose a method to improve OpenVLA and Octo using demonstrations from expert RL policies. Their approach focuses on generating high-quality training data to fine-tune VLA models, as these models performance is highly dependent on the quality of their training data. Their experiments demonstrate that this method outperforms models trained solely on human demonstrations, achieving superior results in real-world precision manipulation tasks.
Metadata record
One description, two standard projections
Built from what the sources declared and what the gates observed.
Nothing absent has been filled in here.
1 value read out of the text by the enrichment rules and 98 links to or from other resources — a lab's files, the pages it links, the works it cites stand under their elements, marked inferred, and are kept apart in the exports.
DCMI Metadata Terms. Dublin Core has no element that separates the original file from the text extracted out of it, and none for LOM's educational characterisation. Both survive here as provenance statements and in the record itself, not in the projection.
the standard ↗
The groups below are this library's, for reading. DCMI Terms itself has no categories; each term keeps its standard name.
Recently, generative AI and reinforcement learning (RL) have been redefining what is possible for AI agents that take information flows as input and produce intelligent behavior. As a result, we are seeing similar advancements in embodied AI and robotics for control policy generation. Our review paper examines the integration of generative AI models with RL to advance robotics. Our primary focus is on the duality between generative AI and RL for robotics downstream tasks. Specifically, we investigate: (1) The role of prominent generative AI tools as modular priors for multi-modal input fusion in RL tasks. (2) How RL can train, fine-tune and distill generative models for policy generation, such as VLA models, similarly to RL applications in large language models. We then propose a new taxonomy based on a considerable amount of selected papers. Lastly, we identify open challenges accounting for model scalability, adaptation and grounding, giving recommendations and insights on future research directions. We reflect on which generative AI models best fit the RL tasks and why. On the other side, we reflect on important issues inherent to RL-enhanced generative policies, such as safety concerns and failure modes, and what are the limitations of current methods. A curated collection of relevant research papers is maintained on our GitHub repository, serving as a resource for ongoing research and development in this field: https://github.com/clmoro/Robotics-RL-FMs-Integration.
The abstract, and the depositor's additional notes after it when the source has a field for them.
Where the work was published, in the source's own words: a journal with its volume and pages, a conference, an imprint.
Relations and custody
1/9
Is part ofdcterms:isPartOf
none found — the source did not declare it
The repository, book or record this resource was found inside.
Has partdcterms:hasPart
none found — the source did not declare it
What this resource is made of, when the source lists its parts.
Is version ofdcterms:isVersionOf
none found — the source did not declare it
Has versiondcterms:hasVersion
none found — the source did not declare it
Referencesdcterms:references
inferred
read its reference list, line 447citation
arXiv:2303.08774
arXiv:2308.12270
arXiv:2204.01691
arXiv:2211.15657
arXiv:2312.09187
arXiv:2301.08028
arXiv:2402.08546
arXiv:2309.13041
arXiv:2108.07258
arXiv:2212.06817
arXiv:2307.15818
arXiv:2404.00282
and 86 more, every one of them in the export
Works this one cites, when the source declares them as relations. What its text links to and its reference list cites is inferred, and stands under it apart.
Is referenced bydcterms:isReferencedBy
none found — the source did not declare it
What links to or cites this one, when a source declares it; inferred from the texts held otherwise, and set apart.
Requiresdcterms:requires
none found — the source did not declare it
What this resource needs in order to be used, when a source declares it. The files a lab works on are inferred, and stand under it apart.
Is required bydcterms:isRequiredBy
none found — the source did not declare it
What needs this resource, when a source declares it. The lab a component belongs to is inferred, and stands under it apart.
Provenancedcterms:provenance
this engine
source
conversion
latexml-html
Retrieved from arXiv on 2026-10-09 in response to the search string “(all:"artificial intelligence" OR all:"machine learning" OR all:"generative AI" OR all:"deep learning" OR all:"reinforcement learning" OR all:"large language model") AND (all:"AI concepts" OR all:"types of AI" OR all:"AI fundamentals" OR all:"recognizing AI" OR all:"recognising AI" OR all:"general versus narrow AI" OR all:"narrow AI" OR all:"general AI" OR all:"machine intelligence" OR all:"AI strengths and weaknesses" OR all:"traditional software" OR all:"rule-based systems" OR all:"introduction to AI" OR all:"introduction to artificial intelligence" OR all:"artificial intelligence introduction" OR all:"AI primer" OR all:"foundations of artificial intelligence" OR all:"overview of AI" OR all:"understanding AI" OR all:"history of AI" OR all:"AI essentials" OR all:"AI terminology" OR all:"metaphors for AI" OR all:"AI fundamental concepts" OR all:"AI key concepts" OR all:"philosophy of AI" OR all:"critical AI literacy")”. arXiv served the resource and is not asserted to be its publisher or author.
Text extracted from latexml-html to Markdown by arxiv-html; the original is retained unchanged beside it.
Where it was collected from, what was converted, and what container it came out of — the custody statements that would otherwise be mistaken for authorship.
IEEE 1484.12.1 Learning Object Metadata. LOM has no element for an SPDX identifier or a licence URI, so both are written into 6.3 Rights.Description. Flattening this record into simple Dublin Core would lose more again, which is why the two projections exist side by side rather than one being generated from the other.
the standard ↗
Recently, generative AI and reinforcement learning (RL) have been redefining what is possible for AI agents that take information flows as input and produce intelligent behavior. As a result, we are seeing similar advancements in embodied AI and robotics for control policy generation. Our review paper examines the integration of generative AI models with RL to advance robotics. Our primary focus is on the duality between generative AI and RL for robotics downstream tasks. Specifically, we investigate: (1) The role of prominent generative AI tools as modular priors for multi-modal input fusion in RL tasks. (2) How RL can train, fine-tune and distill generative models for policy generation, such as VLA models, similarly to RL applications in large language models. We then propose a new taxonomy based on a considerable amount of selected papers. Lastly, we identify open challenges accounting for model scalability, adaptation and grounding, giving recommendations and insights on future research directions. We reflect on which generative AI models best fit the RL tasks and why. On the other side, we reflect on important issues inherent to RL-enhanced generative policies, such as safety concerns and failure modes, and what are the limitations of current methods. A curated collection of relevant research papers is maintained on our GitHub repository, serving as a resource for ongoing research and development in this field: https://github.com/clmoro/Robotics-RL-FMs-Integration.
The abstract, and the depositor's additional notes after it as a second LangString when the source has a field for them.
Role, entity and date per declared contribution. A role outside LOM's vocabulary is reported in the entry's description instead.
3 Meta-metadata
4/4
Identifier3.1
this engine
resource_id
URI: tag:aim-pro.eu,2026:oer/5835121c01b5/record
The identifier of this metadata record — the resource's own, with /record after it, because the record is a description of the resource and not the resource.
Contribute3.2
this engine
source
AIM-PRO WP3 OER harvester (arXiv) — creator
Who generated this record and when — a statement about the record, not about the resource.
Metadata schema3.3
LOMv1.0
aimpro-oer-profile/1
LOMv1.0, and the profile this was built against.
Language3.4
language gate
read the declared field
en
4 Technical
3/7
Format4.1
conversion
latexml-html
text/markdown
One value per form held: the original as the source published it, and the Markdown this engine extracted.
Size4.2
conversion
latexml-html
127545
Bytes. The original's, because the resource is the file and not our conversion of it.
Location4.3
this engine
resource_id
https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16411
Where the source serves it.
Requirement4.4
not collected — this library does not fill it
Software or hardware needed to use it. No source declares it.
Installation remarks4.5
not collected — this library does not fill it
No source declares it.
Other platform requirements4.6
not collected — this library does not fill it
No source declares it.
Duration4.7
not collected — this library does not fill it
Playing time, for audio and video. The corpus holds neither.
5 Educational
1/11
Interactivity type5.1
not collected — this library does not fill it
Active, expositive or mixed. A judgement about how the resource is used; no source declares it.
Yes unless the licence reserves nothing — attribution is a restriction. The conditions after the dash are the licence gate's reading; the export carries LOM's bare term.
The SPDX id, the licence URI and the conditions. LOM has no element for any of the three, so this is where they survive.
7 Relation
2/2
Kind7.1
ispartof
Resource7.2
inferred
read its reference list, line 447citation
Information Fusion Volume 129, May 2026, 104003
references: arXiv:2303.08774
references: arXiv:2308.12270
references: arXiv:2204.01691
references: arXiv:2211.15657
references: arXiv:2312.09187
references: arXiv:2301.08028
references: arXiv:2402.08546
references: arXiv:2309.13041
references: arXiv:2108.07258
references: arXiv:2212.06817
references: arXiv:2307.15818
references: arXiv:2404.00282
and 86 more, every one of them in the export
The container a file was found inside, and the Markdown extracted from the original. What a lab requires, and the lab a component belongs to, are inferred and stand apart.
8 Annotation
0/3
Entity8.1
not collected — this library does not fill it
Comments on the resource's educational use, by whoever made them. The platform's review grades competencies, which are classification (9), and writes no comment here.
Date8.2
not collected — this library does not fill it
Description8.3
not collected — this library does not fill it
9 Classification
0/4
Purpose9.1
not collected — this library does not fill it
Empty in the record: no source declares a competency. The alignment reads the resource for them and stands beside the record, never in it, and a taxon path derived from the search string that found it would be a claim about the query.
Taxon path9.2
not collected — this library does not fill it
Where the competency framework goes. Empty in the record for the reason above.
Description9.3
not collected — this library does not fill it
Keyword9.4
not collected — this library does not fill it
What could not be established3
Where the source's metadata could not be carried
over as it was — missing, contradictory, with no matching term in the
standard, restructured, or taken from the repository — and what was done
instead. Without these notes, an empty element would look like something
the harvester missed.
Status
Field
Why
Not available
rights_holder
no rights holder is named at source; the licence is recorded without one rather than attributed to the platform that served it
Not available
publisher
the source named no publisher of the work; where it was collected from is recorded as collection provenance instead, which is a different claim
Not available
educational
the source declared no educational metadata — no resource type, audience, context, difficulty or learning time. Nothing here estimates them